Hanselman v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KELLEY, Judge.
Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) appeals by permission an interlocutory order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County (trial court) denying Comail’s motion in limine.
The history of this case has been set forth previously by this court in Hanselman v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, 158 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 568, 632 A.2d 607 (1993) (hereinafter referred to as “Hanselman I ”). The facts set forth in Hanselman I and the procedural history relevant to the present appeal are as follows.
On September 24, 1987, Mark Schubert was operating an automobile in which Kenneth…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Buttermore v. Aliquippa HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Farber v. ENGLECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Nigro v. Remington Arms Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Hanselman v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
3Cited by2 opinions
- South River Power Partners, L.P. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Weeast v. Borough of Wind GapCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996