Legal Opinion

Weeast v. Borough of Wind Gap

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 6, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLINS, President Judge.

Herbert E. Weeast and Marlene Weeast, his wife, (Appellants) appeal from the July 19,1995 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County (trial court), which denied Appellants’ motion for post-trial relief and modified a judgment that Appellants previously won against the Borough of Wind Gap (Borough).

The following facts have produced the instant appeal. On November 3, 1987, Appellants instituted an action against the Borough, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and Robert and Sally Rissmiller for damage sustained to their real property as a result of flooding…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spang & Co. v. USX Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Nigro v. Remington Arms Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Bristol Township Water Authority v. Lower Bucks County Joint Municipal AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Weeast v. Borough of Wind GapCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Hanselman v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Linefsky v. Redevelopment Authority of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Lafferty, H. v. Ferris, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API