Legal Opinion

Hanselman v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1993No. 456 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) appeals from an October 22, 1990 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County which granted summary judgment to additional defendant Mark Schubert and dismissed all claims against him filed by Kenneth Hanselman and Marco Gasper arising out of an automobile accident as well as all claims of the original defendants filed against Schubert which derived from Hanselman and Gasper’s claims. 1 The issues Conrail presents in this appeal are whether the trial court committed an error of law by granting Schubert’s summary judgment motion…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Buttermore v. Aliquippa HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. E. J. McAleer & Co. v. Iceland Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Davis v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Charles v. Giant Eagle MarketsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Hasselrode v. GnageySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. North Penn Sanitation, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Fidelity Bond & Mortgage Co. v. Brand (In Re Fidelity Bond & Mortgage Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Holt v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Hanselman v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. North Penn Sanitation, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API