Legal Opinion

DLB Collection Trust Ex Rel. Helgesen & Waterfall v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 22, 1995No. 930474-CAPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BILLINGS, Judge:

We have determined that “[t]he facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and record and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument.” Utah R.App.P. 29(a)(3).

Third-party plaintiff, the Harris Family Trust (the Trust), appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Estate of Darwin M. Larsen (the Estate). The trial court ruled as a matter of law that the Trust could not maintain an action against the Estate and that the Trust presented insufficient evidence to create a material issue of fact on its…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Morris v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Empire Life Insurance Company of America v. Valdak CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. Zokoych v. SpaldingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  4. Adair v. WozniakOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Weiss v. NORTHWEST ACCEPTANCE CORPORATIONOregon Supreme Court · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Labovitz, Peter C. v. WA Times CorpCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
  2. Career Service Review Board v. Utah Department of CorrectionsUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Okelberry v. WEST DANIELS LAND ASSOCIATIONCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
  4. Prinsburg State Bank v. AbundoUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Labovitz v. Washington Times Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API