Legal Opinion
Labovitz v. Washington Times Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 28, 1995No. Civ. A. 95-138 SSHPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss. The Court grants defendants’ motion in major part, in accordance with this Opinion. Athough “[findings of fact and conclusions of law are unnecessary on decisions of motions under Rule 12 or 56,” Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a), the Court nonetheless sets forth its reasoning.
Background
Because this matter is before the Court on a motion to dismiss, the Court takes plaintiffs’ factual allegations to be true. Maljack Prods., Inc. v. Motion Picture Ass’n of Am., Inc., 52 F.3d 373, 375 (D.C.Cir.1995). As…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Mid-State Fertilizer Co., Lasley Kimmel, and Maxine Kimmel v. Exchange National Bank of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- City of Harper Woods Employees' Retirement System Ex Rel. BAE Systems Plc. v. OlverCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Flocco v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Labovitz, Peter C. v. WA Times CorpCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Boomer Development, LLC v. National Association of Home Builders of the United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Association of Merger Dealers, LLC v. Tosco Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.