Legal Opinion

Prinsburg State Bank v. Abundo

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 2012No. 20110755PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice DURRANT,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

11 This case requires us to consider whether a party who has stipulated to the resolution of its claims may subsequently challenge that resolution on appeal. In this case, after the district court denied all but one of Prinsburg State Bank's (Prinsburg's) claims on summary judgment, the parties stipulated to the resolution of each of the issues they had presented to the court. Specifically, the parties stipulated to a list of statements that were consistent with the district court's findings and conclusions, and additionally to a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pratt v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  2. R.T. Nielson Co. v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Mascaro v. DavisUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  4. First of Denver Mortgage Investors v. C. N. Zundel & AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake City v. Mitsui Investment Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Chard v. ChardCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  2. Becker v. Sunset CityUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. RigbyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
  4. Baumann v. Kroger Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. EyreUtah Supreme Court · 2021

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API