Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Pride

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1940No. Appeal, 259PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadtfeld, J.,

The defendant, Donald M. Pride, was charged on indictment, with having committed open lewdness by reason of an indecent and public exposure of his person on the night of May 29, 1940. He was convicted and sentenced. In this appeal it is argued that the trial judge failed in his duty to control the examination of the witnesses, that the charge to the jury by the trial judge was unfair, prejudicial and did not adequately protect the interests of the defendant, and that the trial judge failed to refer defendant’s motion for a new trial to the court in banc. As we find no…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Commonwealth v. JordanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Commonwealth v. LindnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Commonwealth v. DiagicobbeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Commonwealth v. KaminskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KloiberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Melot v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. Commonwealth v. HoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Commonwealth v. HoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Commonwealth v. KloiberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API