Commonwealth v. Jordan
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Stern,
Defendant appeals from a conviction of voluntary manslaughter. His chief complaint is that the evidence did not establish guilt on his part. This contention is not tenable, as a summary of the facts which the jury would have been justified in finding will demonstrate.
John Coles and Fletcher Williams worked in or around the Paramount Court garage, where the murdered man, Norman Bechtel, kept his automobile. Oliver Armstrong roomed with defendant, William Jordan, whose occupation was that of chauffeur. On the after noon of January 19, 1932, defendant, Coles and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DelfinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Commonwealth v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Commonwealth v. BarrishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Commonwealth v. DucaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Rudy v. CommonwealthLancaster County Court of Oyer and Terminer · 1889
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BonomoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth v. NewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Commonwealth v. DonoughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Commonwealth v. ScoleriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Commonwealth v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.