Legal Opinion

Peerless Insurance v. South Boston Storage & Warehouse, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 16, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.

In this case of first impression in Massachusetts, we are asked to decide whether a surety on a public warehouse-men’s licensing bond is liable for all claims filed against it on a “per occurrence” basis or for the maximum of the penal sum *326of the bond. We hold that the surety’s total liability is limited to the penal sum of the bond.

The plaintiff, Peerless Insurance Company (bonding company), is the surety on a bond in the penal sum of $10,000 (increased from $5,000) in which the principals on the bond are the defendants, South Boston Storage and Warehouse, Inc. (South Boston), and Louis…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Salo v. Pacific Coast Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. HydeOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Paulsell v. PetersWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CasassaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Travelers Indemnity Company v. AskewDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peerless Ins. Co. v. SOUTH BOSTON STORAGE WAREHOUSEMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  2. Mejia v. Merrimack Valley Exchange Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API