Peerless Insurance v. South Boston Storage & Warehouse, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtNolan, J.
In this case of first impression in Massachusetts, we are asked to decide whether a surety on a public warehouse-men’s licensing bond is liable for all claims filed against it on a “per occurrence” basis or for the maximum of the penal sum *326of the bond. We hold that the surety’s total liability is limited to the penal sum of the bond.
The plaintiff, Peerless Insurance Company (bonding company), is the surety on a bond in the penal sum of $10,000 (increased from $5,000) in which the principals on the bond are the defendants, South Boston Storage and Warehouse, Inc. (South Boston), and Louis…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Salo v. Pacific Coast Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. HydeOregon Supreme Court · 1934
- Paulsell v. PetersWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. CasassaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. AskewDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Peerless Ins. Co. v. SOUTH BOSTON STORAGE WAREHOUSEMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Mejia v. Merrimack Valley Exchange Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1999