Legal Opinion

Mejia v. Merrimack Valley Exchange Corp.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided December 7, 1999No. 983364EPublished

1Opinion of the CourtGarsh, J.

Plaintiff, Robert Mejia (“Mejia”), brings this action seeking damages under a statutory bond issued by defendant, United Casualty and Surety Insurance Company (“United”), to defendant, Merrimack Valley Exchange Corp. (“Merrimack”), pursuant to G.L.c. 169, §2. United now moves for partial summary judgment as to Mejia’s claims against it on the ground that the transactions between Mejia and Merrimack are not covered by the bond. For the following reasons, United’s motion for summary judgment is allowed.

BACKGROUND

On December 8, 1994, United issued Merrimack, as principal, a bond pursuant to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Cassesso v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API