Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Korneghy

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 1954No. 6 Div. 687PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal by the Republic Steel Corporation, employer, and the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, insurer.

The basis for the suit is the claim by the appellee, insured, that the appellants wrongfully eliminated the former from coverage and benefits under a group policy of insurance.

In the court below the presiding judge, without the aid of a jury, rendered judgment in favor of the insured.

Apparently the amount of the judgment is the sum total, with interest, of all contributions the insured had made to premium payments during the entire time he had enjoyed…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Smithart v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Davis v. Metropolitan InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Poch v. Equit. L. Assur. Soc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Hayes v. the Equitable Life Assurance Soc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Louisville Cartage Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1990
  2. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY INC. v. HareCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1972
  3. Harrison v. Insurance Company of North AmericaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  4. Thomas L. Burton and Edith M. Burton v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. Fagan v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API