Legal Opinion

Smithart v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1934PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swiggart

This is an action to enforce a contract of life and disability insurance, evidenced by a group policy issued to complainant’s employer and by a certificate issued to complainant.

Complainant’s contention is that the contract matured when he became wholly and permanently disabled while the contract was in force.

The issue as to the fact of complainant’s disability was submitted to a jury, A verdict for the complainant was set aside by the chancellor, and a new trial was granted. Thereafter, at the same term, the chancellor sustained the defendant’s motion to dismiss the suit because the contract…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Teague v. SowderTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Phoenix Cotton Oil Co. v. Royal Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  4. McGifford v. Protective Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Laurenzi v. Atlas Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Petty v. SloanTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Individual Healthcare Specialists, Inc. v. Bluecross Blueshield of Tennessee, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2019
  3. E. O. Bailey & Co. v. Union Planters Title Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949
  4. Nidiffer v. Clinchfield RailroadCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  5. Home Beneficial Ass'n v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1944

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API