Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Bridge

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 12, 2000No. 9604325CV; CA A103185PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Wife appeals from a judgment of dissolution of marriage under ORS 107.105, claiming that the trial court erred in dividing the parties’ property according to a prenuptial agreement. Husband cross-appeals, challenging the trial court’s award of spousal support. We dismiss the appeal on jurisdictional grounds, ORS 19.240, and, on de novo review, ORS 19.415(3), vacate the spousal support award on cross-appeal.

At the time of trial, husbánd was 73 years old and wife was 63 years old. The parties married on April 25, 1987, and had been married for ten years at the time of the dissolution. Wife had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Unander v. UnanderOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Merrill v. Estate of MerrillOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Mullens v. L. Q. Development, Oregon Ltd.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Reiling v. ReilingOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Matter of Marriage of PurcellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re KnappenbergerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In re the Marriage of GintherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. Banerjee and FiorilloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. In re the Marriage of McInnisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API