Legal Opinion

Matter of Marriage of Purcell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 13, 1989No. D8807-65077; CA A50420PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Husband appeals from a judgment awarding spousal support and attorney fees to wife in this dissolution action. On de novo review, we affirm.

Husband and wife were married in 1985. Before their marriage, they entered into a prenuptial agreement that provided that neither would have a claim for support from the other during the marriage or in the event of dissolution. It further provided that attorney fees should be awarded to the prevailing party in any action brought to enforce terms or conditions of the agreement. At the time of dissolution, wife testified that she had no money or savings and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Unander v. UnanderOregon Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of BridgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. Marriage of Bowers v. BowersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Marriage of Bowers v. BowersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API