Legal Opinion

Banerjee and Fiorillo

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 7, 2021No. A170802PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

446 Argued and submitted June 9, 2020, appeal dismissed April 7, 2021 In the Matter of the Marriage of Sudeshna BANERJEE, Petitioner-Appellant, and Joseph Anthony FIORILLO, Respondent-Respondent. Lane County Circuit Court 18DR16707; A170802

485 P3d 920

Mother appeals a judgment of dissolution of marriage, challenging the trial court’s custody award and parenting time plan. Father moves to dismiss mother’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Held: Mother’s service of the notice of appeal on father’s trial attorney was defective because, at the time of service, the attorney had been discharged as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Beall Transport Equipment Co. v. Southern Pacific TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. Beall Transport Equipment Co. v. Southern Pacific TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. State v. Martinez-RodriguezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
  4. McCall v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Ann Sacks Tile & Stone, Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Follansbee v. OoiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  2. Townsend and TownsendCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  3. Townsend and TownsendCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. Follansbee v. OoiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API