Legal Opinion

United States v. Christopher Walker

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 8, 1999No. 97-1753PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONTIE, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-appellant Christopher Walker (“Walker”) appeals the district court’s finding that he was not entitled to an acceptance of responsibility reduction under U.S.S.G. § 8E1.1. We affirm the district court for the following reasons.

I

On August 29, 1996, the grand jury for the Western District of Michigan returned a five-count indictment against Walker and one co-defendant, Melvin Sylvester (“Sylvester”). The indictment charged the two men with conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) and 846 (Count One), and charged Walker with distributing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Edward Lee MahaffeyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Charles ZimmerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Laura P. LassiterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Juan Manuel Garcia (93-1002) Arturo Garcia (93-1056) and Howard Eugene McCully Jr. (93-1054)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Carol W. DonathanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. Jackie Lee BanksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. GatewoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. David Searer, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  5. United States v. CopeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API