Legal Opinion
United States v. Juan Manuel Garcia (93-1002) Arturo Garcia (93-1056) and Howard Eugene McCully Jr. (93-1054)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 29, 1994No. 93-1002, 1054 and 1056PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SILER, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Juan Manuel Garcia, Arturo Garcia, and Howard Eugene McCully, Jr., challenge their convictions and sentences for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana. We affirm for the reasons set out herein.
I
The marijuana conspiracy in this case began in the spring of 1990, when Amador Briseno offered to pay Juan Manuel Garcia to deliver marijuana from Texas to Michigan. In August or September 1990, the marijuana deliveries began, and they ended in January 1991 with the arrest of Briseno and others in Michigan.
The conspirators transported marijuana in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Alicio M. Sanchez (89-2432) and Reinaldo Cubilla (89-2433)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Isidro Moreno (90-5832), Paul R. Morris (90-5867)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Jerry WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Randolph Thompson, Terrius Wynn, Alcus Todd Thompson, and Donovan DawesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. William D. SassanelliCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Ryan E. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Reda GhazalehCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Christopher WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Juan Francisco Gonzalez, Also Known as Michael Andrew QuinonesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.