Legal Opinion

United States v. Cope

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 4, 2001No. 00-5582PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Randall E. Cope appeals the sentence imposed upon his pleas of guilty and nolo contendere to charges that he sent annoying and harassing electronic mail messages in interstate and foreign communication in violation of 47 U.S.C. § 223(a)(1)(C). The parties have expressly waived oral argument, and upon examination, the panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. RApp. P. 34(a).

Cope pleaded guilty and nolo contendere to multiple charges that he harassed his former girl-friend, Sarah K. Jackson, a nationally recognized high school teacher, by sending incriminating e-mail…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Curtis D. Ables (96-6715) and Jackie Lamkin (96-6643)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. Priscilla SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Larry Terrell McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Jason S. MiseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Robert Lorne SalyerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cope v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API