Legal Opinion

Feavel v. City of Appleton

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1940PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

The action was brought under sec. 269.56, Stats., — the Declaratory Judgments Act, — for the purpose of having determined whether the plaintiffs, as aldermen of the city of Appleton, should be paid salaries at the rate of $500 per annum, or $250 per annum. It was agreed by the parties that the allegations of the complaint and certain additional allegations of the answer, should be taken as true and should constitute the stipulated facts. So many of those facts as are relevant to the questions of law presented, will be briefly summarized. In the year 1937, the common council of the city of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Elliott v. KellyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. State ex rel. Banks v. McClureWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Hull v. Winnebago CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Smith v. City of PhillipsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Pulcifer v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. State Ex Rel. Althouse v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Landt v. City of Wisconsin DellsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Otey v. Common Council of City of MilwaukeeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1968
  5. Save Our Fire Department Paramedics Committee v. City of AppletonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API