Legal Opinion

Hull v. Winnebago County

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1882PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Winnebago .County. The county board of supervisors of Winnebago county having rejected plaintiff’s claim to be paid a certain sum as a balance due him on his salary as treasurer of said county during the years 1879 and 1880; he appealed to the circuit court; and from a judgment there in favor of the defendant county, he appealed to this court. The grounds of the plaintiff’s claim will sufficiently appear from the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCole, C. J.

The facts upon which the question of law arises in this case, are these: Tho plaintiff was elected county treasurer in November, 1878, and entered iTpon the duties of his office on the first Monday of January following. The annual salary of his immediate predecessor, as fixed by the county board, was $1,400. The annual session of the county board which began November 13,1877, was continued until the 28th of-that month, when it was adjourned to the 8th of January, 1878. After a session of three days in January, it was again adjourned to the 12th day of March, 1878, when the annual salary of…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pulcifer v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Feavel v. City of AppletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  3. State ex rel. Banks v. McClureWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  4. (1972), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1972
  5. (1972), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API