Legal Opinion

Bank of Earlsboro v. J. E. Crosbie, Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 25, 1938No. 27196PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HÜRST, J.

Plaintiff, .7. E. Crosbie, Inc., employed a contractor to build a gasoline plant on one of its oil and gas leases. The contractor assigned all of his interest in the money due under the contract to the defendant, Bank of Earlsboro, and left for parts unknown. The subcontractors and laborers, who did the work for the contractor, had not been paid, and were claiming, or about to claim, liens on plaintiff’s lease. One laborer had filed a lien, but no one had filed suit. Alleging these facts in a “Bill of Interpleader”, plaintiff commenced this action. The contractor, the bank, and the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Abraham v. HomerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Welch v. FochtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. EnoSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  4. Johnson v. StarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Newhall v. KastensIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Waggoner v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Lembke Construction Co. v. JD Coggins CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Sanders v. Oklahoma Employment Sec. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  4. Dunbar v. Tulsa Metropolitan Water AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. OuartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API