Legal Opinion

Carl v. Richards

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 7, 1925No. 15177PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THREADGILL, C.

This action was commenced by Clare L. Richards, as plaintiff, against R. Y. Walker, J. W. Carle, E. Lee Adams, E. O. Johnson, A. B. DeWater, B. E. Williams, and W. W. Vincent and Dr. E. M. Miller, as defendants, to enforce a claim under the contractor’s bond, growing out of the construction of a waterworks system for the town of Buffalo, in favor of L. B. Coffey, his assignee.

The items, making up the claim in the sum of $263.40, were for work and labor performed in the employ of the contractor, R. Y. Walker, in contracting the waterworks system. The plaintiff had…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. KruegerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Thompson v. Grider Implement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Dolese Bros. Co. v. Chaney RickardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Lohr & Trapnell v. H. W. Johns-Manville Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Evatt v. DulaneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fuller v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Hyde Const. Co. v. Fricken-SchmidtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Mid-Continent Casualty Co. v. W. S. Dickey Clay Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API