Legal Opinion

Lauderdale v. Tookolo

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 26, 1925No. 15842PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.

This action was commenced by the defendant in error, Ida Rena Tooko-lo, as plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, Dochie Lauderdale as defendant, for the purpose of recovering a one-fourth undivided interest in certain real estate alleged to be the allotment of one Winnie Martin, deceased, and to quiet title to said interest. The case was submitted in the court below upon an agreed statement of facts, upon which judgment was rendered in fav- or of the plaintiff and against the defendant, and from which the defendant appealed to this court. The parties will be referred to as they appeared…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. LettySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. In Re Impunnubbee's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Homer v. McCurtainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Battiest v. WolfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coats v. RileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Caesar v. BurgessCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  3. Parnacher v. MountCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  4. Anglin v. PattersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Brown v. RochesterCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API