Legal Opinion

Yates v. Bridge Trading Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1992No. 60217PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUDLOWSKI, Judge.

This case involves the issuance of stock for a promissory note by a Delaware corporation having its principal place of business in Missouri. Plaintiff-appellant, James M. Yates, appeals a court tried judgment by the Circuit Court for the City of St. Louis finding the contract arising from a stock purchase agreement void under Missouri law because the consideration exchanged for the stock was a promissory note.

On appeal, Yates argues that the trial court erred in entering judgment for respondent, Bridge Trading Company, on several grounds. First, appellant argues he had…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Gries Sports Enterprises, Inc. v. ModellOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. National Starch and Chemical Corp. v. NewmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Blair v. F. H. Smith Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1931
  5. Egan v. McNamaraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Newell Co. v. PetersenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  2. Pvi, Inc., and William G. Skelly v. Ratiopharm Gmbh, a German CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  3. A.O.A. v. RennertDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2018
  4. In Re Bridge Information Systems, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · 2005
  5. Brown v. GillespieMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API