Blair v. F. H. Smith Co.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor:
The issuance in May, 1928, by the defendant company of fifty thousand shares of common stock to Pitts as trustee, is defended by no one who has appeared to offer testimony. Pitts himself, however, in the answer which was filed before he repudiated the authority of his solicitor to represent him, avers that the fifty thous- and shares were issued to him for a valuable consideration. He does not say what the consideration was. The company, according to its answer, knows of no consideration other than that shown in the resolution authorizing the issuance of the stock. The only…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lofland v. CahallSupreme Court of Delaware · 1922
- Finch v. Warrior Cement Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928
- John W. Cooney Co. v. Arlington Hotel Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1917
- Triplex Shoe Co. v. Rice & Hutchins, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1930
- Ellis v. Penn Beef Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Rosenthal v. Burry Biscuit Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1948
- Staar Surgical Co. v. WaggonerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
- Gow v. Consolidated Coppermines Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1933
- Maclary v. Pleasant Hills, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1954
- Perrott v. United States Banking CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1944
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.