Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Brundidge

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided September 26, 1985No. CM 443644PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON REMAND

WOLD, Senior Judge:

In United States v. Brundidge, 17 M.J. 586 (A.C.M.R.1983), we affirmed the findings and the sentence in appellant’s case. In part, we said:

[W]e find the sentence appropriate. In reaching this conclusion we have not considered the extra-record sentence matters offered by appellant. Our jurisdiction as defined by Article 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c), does not extend to matters outside of the “entire record.” United States v. Fagnan, [30 C.M.R., 192 (C.M. A.1961) ].

17 M.J. at 588. Appellant thereafter petitioned the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. SnellingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. BallardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  4. United States v. LanfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  5. United States v. OlingerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. MatiasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  2. United States v. WilliamsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986
  3. United States v. BlakeU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
  4. United States v. FriersonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
  5. United States v. MatiasU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API