Legal Opinion

Tanner v. Board of Appeals

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 18, 2004No. 03-P-1082PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

At issue in this appeal is whether the Boxford zoning by-law authorizes the operation of a stand-alone veterinary hospital, either by right (as an agricultural use) or by special permit. The defendant board of appeals (board) concluded the by-law does not permit such use either by right or by special permit, and a judge of the Land Court, acting on cross motions for summary judgment, agreed. We add our agreement to the list.

*648Background. The plaintiffs, licensed veterinarians, have resided in Boxford since 1994 and have operated a veterinary hospital from their residence during that time.4 They…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Zone Book, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Framingham Clinic, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. Flemings v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. Building Commissioner v. Dispatch Communications of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  5. Steege v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Heim v. Zoning Board of Appeals of New CanaanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Pelullo v. CroftMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
  3. Heim v. ZONING BD. OF APPEALS OF TOWN OF NEW CANAANSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  4. Miles-Matthias v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
  5. Guardione v. Town of LongmeadowMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API