Legal Opinion
Heim v. ZONING BD. OF APPEALS OF TOWN OF NEW CANAAN
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided September 2, 2008No. SC 18088PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
The present case arises from the decision of the named defendant, the zoning board of appeals (board) of the town of New Canaan (town), denying the appeal of the plaintiffs, Quentin Heim and Sandy Deasi, from the issuance of a zoning permit for the operation of a veterinary clinic to the defendant Gen Three, LLC, which had applied for the permit on behalf of the intervening defendants, veterinarians Andrew Rappaport and Daniel Hochman.1 The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying their appeal from the decision of the board. The issues presented in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- West Hartford Interfaith Coalition, Inc. v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Reid v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- DeBeradinis v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Parish of St. Andrew's Protestant Episcopal Church v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Gordon v. Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hartford/Windsor Healthcare Properties, LLC v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Rainforest Cafe, Inc. v. Department of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Heim v. Zoning Board of Appeals of New CanaanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Levine v. Town of SterlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Heim v. ZONING BD. OF APPEALS OF TOWN OF NEW CANAANSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.