Legal Opinion

Heim v. Zoning Board of Appeals of New Canaan

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 23, 2008No. SC 18088PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VERTEFEUILLE, J.

The present case arises from the decision of the named defendant, the zoning board of appeals (board) of the town of New Canaan (town), denying the appeal of the plaintiffs, Quentin Heim and Sandy Deasi, from the issuance of a zoning permit for the operation of a veterinary clinic to the defendant Gen Three, LLC, which had applied for the permit on behalf of the intervening defendants, veterinarians Andrew Rappaport and Daniel Hochman.1 The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying their appeal from the decision of the board. The dispositive issue…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. West Hartford Interfaith Coalition, Inc. v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Gordon v. Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  3. Wood v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  4. Graff v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. Langer v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Moon v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. Goulet v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. Kobyluck Bros., LLC v. Planning & Zoning Comm'n of WaterfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  4. Mountain Brook Ass'n v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  5. Anatra v. ZONING BD. OF APPEALS OF MADISONConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API