Legal Opinion

Steege v. Board of Appeals

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 9, 1988No. 87-1259PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a ruling of the Land Court that the operation of a boarding stable for horses and a riding academy is an agricultural use protected by G. L. c. 40A, § 3.3 The facts are not in dispute.

Mitchell and Katherine Steege are the owners of property in Stow which contains in excess of five acres and is located in a residential zone. For many years prior to August, 1984, when the Steeges first acquired the land, the locus was part of a twenty-five acre farm which had been used as a 'home for ill and retired horses. From the time they acquired the property, the Steeges have used…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Building Inspector of Mansfield v. CurvinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  3. Webster v. Board of Appeals of ReadingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. LeCompte v. Zoning Board of Appeal for the Village of Barrington HillsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  2. Tanner v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  3. Rudolph v. GolickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  4. Town of Sturbridge v. McDowellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
  5. Town of Tisbury v. Martha's Vineyard CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API