Steege v. Board of Appeals
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from a ruling of the Land Court that the operation of a boarding stable for horses and a riding academy is an agricultural use protected by G. L. c. 40A, § 3.3 The facts are not in dispute.
Mitchell and Katherine Steege are the owners of property in Stow which contains in excess of five acres and is located in a residential zone. For many years prior to August, 1984, when the Steeges first acquired the land, the locus was part of a twenty-five acre farm which had been used as a 'home for ill and retired horses. From the time they acquired the property, the Steeges have used…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Building Inspector of Mansfield v. CurvinMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
- Webster v. Board of Appeals of ReadingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
3Cited by15 opinions
- LeCompte v. Zoning Board of Appeal for the Village of Barrington HillsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- Tanner v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- Rudolph v. GolickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Town of Sturbridge v. McDowellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
- Town of Tisbury v. Martha's Vineyard CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.