Legal Opinion
Cox v. Ann (LNU)
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 14, 2013No. Civil Action No. 12-2678-KHV-GLRPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GERALD L. RUSHFELT, United States Magistrate Judge.
The Court has under consideration two motions filed by pro se Plaintiff Nicolas *1273Cox (Cox or Plaintiff) — a Motion to Compel Cited Case Law (ECF No. 22) and a Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 32). The Court also considers Defendant Sheriffs Motion for Leave to File Surreply to Plaintiffs Reply in Support of his Motion to Compel Case Law (ECF No. 39). For the reasons set out below, the Court denies all three motions.
I. Relevant Factual Background
Plaintiff pro se commenced this action by filing a civil complaint in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Gregory Lee Rucks v. Gary BoergermannCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Hill v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bernard L. Smith v. ADE-WIFCO STEEL PRODUCTS, et al.District Court, D. Kansas · 2026
- Cahail v. United States of America, TheDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025
- Cahail v. United States of America, TheDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025
- Cahail v. United States of America, TheDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025
- Christopher Fountain v. Rodney Steven II, et al.District Court, D. Kansas · 2026
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.