Legal Opinion
Christopher Fountain v. Rodney Steven II, et al.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided July 21, 2026No. 5:26-cv-04079Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS CHRISTOPHER FOUNTAIN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 26-4079-AJP-BGS RODNEY STEVEN II, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PROVISIONALLY GRANTING MOTION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES AND DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Christopher Fountain’s Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees (Doc. 3) and Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. 4). For the reasons explained below, Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis (“IFP”) application (Doc. 3) is provisionally GRANTED while his request…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gregory Lee Rucks v. Gary BoergermannCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Hill v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- White v. ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Lister v. Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Beaudry v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.