Legal Opinion
Higgins v. Oklahoma City
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 14, 1937No. 23822PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
This action was commenced in the district court of Okla homa county by the heirs of Robert W. Higgins against the city of Oklahoma City to recover possession of a certain parcel of land located in said city and formerly occupied as a right of way by a railroad corporation. The parties will be hereafter designated in the order of their appearance at the trial.
This court on appeal of this cause has heretofore affirmed the judgment of the trial court in favor of the defendant (Noble v. Oklahoma City; Higgins v. Same, Consolidated, 172 Okla. 182, 44 P. 2d 135). The case then went to the Supreme…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. Severns Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Marland v. GillespieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Noble v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Rogers v. KinneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Mosier v. MomsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cleary Petroleum Corp. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Rowell v. Gulf, M. O. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Gutensohn v. McGuirtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Midland Valley Railroad v. Arrow Industrial Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Aubert v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.