Aubert v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
*538BINGAMAN, J.
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether a warranty deed made by William Barnett to the St. Louis & Oklahoma City Railroad Company conveyed a fee title, so that by subsequent conveyances the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company, which was vested with whatever title the grantee in said deed acquired, was the owner of the oil and gas and other minerals under the right of way conveyed by the deed. The deed omitting formal parts, reads as follows:
“That I, William Barnett, of the County of Oklahoma in the Territory of Oklahoma, party of the first part, for and in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Right of Way Oil Co. v. Gladys City Oil, Gas & Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1913
- East Alabama Railway Co. v. Doe Ex Dem. VisscherSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Morsbach v. Thurston CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Brightwell v. International-Great Northern RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- Sherman v. Petroleum ExplorationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Midland Valley Railroad v. Arrow Industrial Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Missouri, K. & TR Co. v. MileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Cruzan v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Penn Central Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1982
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.