Legal Opinion

Mosier v. Momsen

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 9, 1903PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from the District Court of Cleveland County; before C. F. Irwin, Trial Judge. STATEMENT OR EACTS. An action by defendant in error as plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error as defendant, in the district court of Cleveland county, to quiet title. Trial, finding and judgment for defendant in error; plaintiff brings case here by petition in error for review.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

BeaúCIíamp, J.:

The real estate in controversy is described in the pleadings as the south part of the northwest quarter of section 35, township 10, north range 2, west, containing 60 acres, and further described by metes and bounds, and was originally owned by Ellen F. Smithers. On the 2nd day of March, 1899, said Ellen F. Smithers conveyed the same by quit claim deed, in consideration of the sum of $600, to E. J. Weeks, and on the same day E. J. Weeks conveyed the same by quit claim deed to F. W. Weeks, in consideration of the sum of $550. On the 4th day of March, 1899,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oliver v. PiattSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  2. May v. Le ClaireSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Moelle v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Garton Et Ux. v. Hudson-Kimberly Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tucker v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Phoenix Title & Trust Co. v. Old Dominion Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Reitz v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. Higgins v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Wilson v. CoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API