Legal Opinion

Marland v. Gillespie

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 13, 1934No. 21180PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBayless, J.

E. W. Marland, plaintiff below; appeals from a judgment of the district court of Kay county, Okla., in favor of the defendant below, Minnie Gillespie, quieting her title to certain real estate. The parties will be referred to herein as plaintiff and defendant, respectively, as they appeared in the trial court.

There is no dispute over the actual events out of which this litigation arose. The controversy revolves around a determination of the legal rights of the parties now that such events have taken place.

Hans C. R. Brodboll acquired title to the northeast quarter of section 27, T. 26 N., R.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Abercrombie v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  2. Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. Severns Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Gilbert v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
  5. Sherman v. ShermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Cleary Petroleum Corp. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Cuneo v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Siegenthaler v. NewtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Texas Co. v. State ex rel. CoryellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  5. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. GriffithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API