Legal Opinion
United States v. Lonnie Schmidt
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 15, 1991No. 90-10473PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLEHER, District Judge:
I. Factual and Procedural Background
Internal Revenue Special Agent Richard Carl was contacted in August 1985 by Internal Revenue Agent Mulholland to investigate appellant Lonnie Schmidt. Carl posed as a Northern California representative in charge of collections for an organized crime gambling interest from Las Vegas. Carl and the Internal Revenue Service had learned that the appellant, along with Herbert Bates, had failed to file Currency Transaction Reports (CTRs).
Agents Carl and Mulholland, in their undercover roles, became acquainted with Dean Salisbury and Joe…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. John Spilotro Herbert Blitzstein and Joseph C. BlaskoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Clarence Jay Crozier, Manuel Isadore Pine, Alan Terry Stein, and Florence Margaret WolkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. James B. Cardwell, United States of America v. Marvin MartinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- United States v. Jose Arambula-RuizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Timothy PittsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Tony SiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Peter James HollerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin Lee NELSON, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.