United States v. Clarence Jay Crozier, Manuel Isadore Pine, Alan Terry Stein, and Florence Margaret Wolke
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SOLOMON, Judge:
This case is before the court on a remand from the Supreme Court of the United States.
On an interlocutory appeal, we affirmed the district court’s orders suppressing evidence seized from the defendants’ residences and we vacated its order restraining defendants Clarence Crozier and Florence Wolke from disposing of much of their real and personal property.
The Supreme Court vacated our decision and remanded the case to us for reconsideration in light of three recent cases: Segura v. United States, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 3380, 82 L.Ed.2d 599 (1984); United States v. Leon, — U.S. —,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by135 opinions
- People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando EstevezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. KaleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. John Spilotro Herbert Blitzstein and Joseph C. BlaskoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Donaciano Hernandez-EscarsegaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.