Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Webster

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 10, 2007No. Misc. Docket AG No. 63, Sept. Term, 2006PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.

The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (“Petitioner”), acting through Bar Counsel and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751(a), 1 filed a Petition For Disciplinary or Remedial Action against Respondent, Arthur D. Webster, on January 31, 2007. Bar Counsel alleged that Respondent violated Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (“MRPC”), 1.1 (Competence), 2 1.3 (Diligence), 3 1.4 (Communication), 4 1.5(b) (Fees), 5 1.15(a) (Safekeeping Property), 6 1.16(d) (Declining or Terminating Representation) 7 and 8.4(a), (c) and (d) (Misconduct). 8 The charges involved Respondent’s represen tation of…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZuckermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND OF MARYLAND v. OwrutskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. Van NelsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FoltzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API