Legal Opinion
Estate of Matthews v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 26, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2007-0301PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This suit alleging that Mary Matthews suffered injuries as a result of her treatment with the drug Zometa marketed and distributed by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, is before this Court on remand from Multi-District Litigation proceedings in the Middle District of Tennessee. Upon remand, the parties were directed to show cause why this case should not be transferred to the United States District Court in the district where Plaintiff resides. The parties agree that the case should be transferred out of the United…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Greater Yellowstone Coalition v. BosworthDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Thayer/Patricof Education Funding, L.L.C. v. Pryor Resources, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rubio v. Monsanto Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Aguilar v. Michael & Son Servs., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Sallyport Global Services, Ltd. v. Arkel International, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Breen v. MinetaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Aguilar v. Michael & Son Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.