Legal Opinion

Becker v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1936No. Appeal, 25PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

This appeal is without merit. It is concerned with an action of assumpsit on a life insurance policy, containing a provision for benefits to the insured in case, before he became sixty years of age, he should become totally and permanently disabled, either physically or mentally, to such an extent as to render him wholly, continuously ¿nd permanently unable to engage in any occupation or perform any work for any kind of compensation of financial value during the remainder of his lifetime.

Sometime after the policy was issued, and when the insured was about forty years…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Janney v. Scranton Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Losnecki v. Mutual L. Ins. Co. of N. Y.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Cantor v. Metropolitan L. Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Amrovcik v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. SaulSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Pearlman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Sebastianelli v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Texas Employers' Insurance v. CrowTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Feigenbaum v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API