Legal Opinion
In Re Merlo
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 10, 2011No. 239 MM 2010PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Presently before the Court are Petitioner’s “Motion to Strike the Order of Interim Suspension” and Application for Leave to Supplement that Motion. We grant the Application for Leave to Supplement that Motion, but for the reasons that follow, upon consideration of the Motion and the Supplement, we deny the Motion to Strike the Order of Interim Suspension.
On November 4, 2010, the Judicial Conduct Board (“JCB”) filed charges against Maryesther Merlo (“Petitioner”), a Le-high County magisterial district judge, charging Petitioner with violating numerous Rules Governing Standards of…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- In Re Assignment of AvellinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Gershenfeld v. Justices of the Supreme Court of Pa.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by11 opinions
- In re BrunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Ferko-Fox v. FoxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- In re MerloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Gladstone Partners, LP v. East Union TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Bruno v. Supreme CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.