Legal Opinion
Bruno v. Supreme Court
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 13, 2013No. Civil Action No. 13-1357PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ANITA B. BRODY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Judge Mark A. Bruno brings suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Chief Justice Ronald D. Castille, Justice Thomas G. Saylor, Justice J. Michael Ea-kin, Justice Deborah McCloskey Todd, Justice Seamus P. McCaffery, and Justice Max Baer (collectively, “PA Supreme Court Defendants”). On February 1, 2013, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court sua sponte suspended Bruno without pay. Bruno claims that the PA Supreme Court Defendants violated his procedural due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Bruno…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re BrunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- In Re: Magisterial District Judge Mark BrunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014