Legal Opinion

Moore v. William Jessup University

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 2015No. C073433PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MAURO, J.

— Plaintiff Stephen Moore, a United Parcel Service (UPS) delivery driver, was injured when he lifted a box with a shipping label prepared by defendant William Jessup University (University) that inaccurately stated the weight of the box. Moore appeals from the judgment entered in favor of the University after the trial court granted summary judgment on Moore’s sole cause of action for negligence. The trial court concluded the University owed Moore no legal duty of care and that the doctrine of primary assumption of risk barred Moore’s action.

Moore contends the trial court…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Cantrell Supply, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2002

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Harry v. Ring the Alarm, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Bakos v. RoachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  3. Gordon v. ARC Manufacturing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2019
  4. Harry v. Ring the Alarm, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  5. People ex rel. Becerra v. Native Wholesale Supply Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API