Legal Opinion

Woods v. Kearney

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided August 9, 2002No. CIV.A.02-247-JJFPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FARNAN, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is a Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habe-as Corpus by a Person in State Custody (D.I.2) filed by Petitioner Daniel M. Woods. Also pending in this matter are Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel and motion for a default judgment. (D.I.3, 8.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court will dismiss the Petition as time barred by the one-year period of limitation prescribed in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). The Court will deny Petitioner’s motions for appointment of counsel and for a default judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

O…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Artuz v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Theodore R. Allen v. E. P. Perini, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  5. Ronald Jones v. Willis Morton, Warden of Trenton State Prison Attorney General of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Lewis v. PhelpsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2009
  2. Carter v. PierceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2016
  3. Bunting v. PhelpsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2009
  4. Crump v. PhelpsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2008
  5. Cochran v. PhelpsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2009

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API