Legal Opinion
Cochran v. Phelps
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 3, 2009No. Civil Action 08-109-SLRPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Currently before the court is petitioner Donald R. Cochran’s (“petitioner”) application for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (D.I.) For the reasons that follow, the court concludes that petitioner’s § 2254 application is not time-barred. The State shall file a supplemental answer addressing any other procedural issues and the merits of the claims asserted in the application.
II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In January 2002, the grand jury indicted petitioner on charges of first degree burglary,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Burton v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Michael Kapral v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Donald Burns v. Willis E. Morton, Superintendent Peter Verniero, the Attorney General of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cochran v. PhelpsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2009
- Hartmann v. Attorney General of State of DelawareDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2023
- JOHNSON v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIADistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Jones v. MayDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024
- Sample v. HutchinsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2012