Legal Opinion

State v. Lynch

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 2013No. 87882-0PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairhurst, J.

¶1 The State charged Jeffrey Thomas Lynch with indecent liberties and second degree rape. At trial, Lynch’s defense to the rape charge was that the State failed to prove forcible compulsion because the alleged victim, T.S., consented to the sexual intercourse. Over Lynch’s objection, the trial court instructed the jury that Lynch had the burden to prove consent by a preponderance of the evidence. The jury found Lynch guilty of the crimes charged. The Court of Appeals affirmed Lynch’s second degree rape conviction but reversed the indecent liberties conviction. We hold that the trial court…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Martin v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. State v. GregoryWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. W.R.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State v. LamarWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  3. In re the Personal Restraint of ColbertWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. KindellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. State v. RaineyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API