Legal Opinion
McDonald v. Doe
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 31, 1986No. 86 Civ. 2070 (RWS)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant David Barnhard (“Barn-hard”), Assistant District Attorney of Bronx Criminal Court, New York, has moved this court to dismiss plaintiff Winston McDonald’s (“McDonald”) complaint against him pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). McDonald, who is pro se, 1 submitted an affidavit in reply instead of a memorandum of law, thus, perhaps inadvertently, converting the motion to one for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 12(b) and Rule 56. Barnhard has submitted an affidavit in reply to McDonald’s. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted in part and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Knight v. U.S. Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- McDonald v. Head Criminal Court Supervisor OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Jermosen v. CoughlinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Morris v. Amalgamated Lithographers of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Salahuddin v. CoughlinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Gabai v. JacobyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.