Legal Opinion
Jermosen v. Coughlin
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 2, 1995No. 88 Civ. 9197 (RJW)PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
Plaintiff pro se Donald R. Jermosen (“Jermosen”) has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., claiming that no genuine dispute exists as to any material fact in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action brought against several employees of the Correspondence Clerks’ Office (the “correspondence clerks”) at the Sing Sing Correctional Facility (“Sing Sing”) and various officials of the New York State Department of Correctional Services (collectively, “the defendants”). Plaintiff has further moved pursuant to Rule 37(b)(2), Fed. R.Civ.P. for…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Davis v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Davis v. GoordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Wali v. One Source Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Allen v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Sacks v. Gandhi Engineering, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.