People v. Rodundo
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the County Court of Alameda County. The defendant was convicted and sentenced, and appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Belcher, J.:
The defendant aiid one Camargo were jointly indicted for the crime of grand larceny, the defendant as principal and Camargo as accessory after the fact.
Upon the trial against the defendant, Camargo was called as a witness for the prosecution, and at the instance of the District Attorney, and against the objections of the defendant, instructed by the Court that anything he might testify to could not be used as evidence against himself.
There can be no doubt that he was a competent witness, and might testify to any facts within his knowledge, whether those facts tended…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. CorbettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. GoldensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- People v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- People v. AnzaloneCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. De LeaMontana Supreme Court · 1908
- State v. MaguireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.